[Tagging] New tag proposal: 'add=milestone'

François Lacombe fl.infosreseaux at gmail.com
Wed Oct 9 23:04:52 UTC 2019


I just want to bring to your attention the work currently done to propose
marker=* key with existing value marker=stone.

This is mainly intended for utility networks but may be useful for highways
It starts with the deprecation of pipeline=marker to use marker as a more
general placeholder for marker definition in combination with utility=*

Do you find highway=**_marker desirable?
Will you consider things like highway=marker + marker=plate + ref=*... ?

This is an opportunity to make things to converge towards a common
framework for many kind of markers here

All the best


Le mer. 9 oct. 2019 à 22:03, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> a
écrit :

> Am Mi., 9. Okt. 2019 um 15:11 Uhr schrieb Paul Allen <pla16021 at gmail.com>:
>> ...some mad king throwing darts at a map: if it looks like a house
>> number, is treated like a house
>> number, and appears on the house/gate/whatever as a house number, then
>> it's a house number.
>> House numbers don't have to be sequential or monotonic, I can think of a
>> couple of roads in my
>> town where the house numbers are counter-intuitive.  So it doesn't matter
>> if those house numbers
>> were assigned based on a distance along a road, and that subsequent road
>> remodelling has
>> resulted in them all being inaccurate without a milepost equation: if it
>> quacks like a house
>> number then it's a house number.
> there is some sense in understanding the system (if there is), e.g. if not
> all numbers are recorded it allows you to estimate where the one you are
> looking for might be, how far it possibly is etc.. This is a typical use
> case: you have an address and are looking for it on the ground.
>> If they're not house numbers marked somewhere on the property, and if
>> there are sometimes
>> (as the OP has stated) missing markers, and if road remodelling has
>> rendered the distances
>> incorrect, then what good is addr:road_marker in those particular
>> circumstances?
>> It appears addr:road_marker is only really applicable where all of the
>> following apply:
>> 1: The number is not marked on the property (otherwise it's a house
>> number, however
>> derived).
> there could be 2 numbers, a distance based on and a recently assigned,
> actual housenumber.
> You could also be interested in comparing an official register to the OSM
> data, e.g. to find missing spots, check for completeness etc.
>> 3) Road markers have not been recalibrated following extensive road
>> remodelling.
> good luck with this. In regions with lacking housenumbers I wouldn't put
> too much confidence in the road markers...
> Cheers
> Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20191010/b6446b49/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list