[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - appointment
Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdreist at gmail.com
Tue Sep 10 08:00:39 UTC 2019
sent from a phone
> On 8. Sep 2019, at 22:11, Simon Poole <simon at poole.ch> wrote:
>
> Isn't this semantically in the end not the same as "unknown" (as in any
> application would have to equate this to "you have to inquire if it is
> open")?
it may be the same for apps, it isn’t for mappers, “unknown” is an imperative for surveying it. It may also make a difference for some searching for such features, because unknown means you might be lucky and they’ll serve you, by appointment means you must not even try if they might be open.
I welcome documenting this value, as it is already used with varying syntax more than 500 times, so it is clear mappers want it: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/opening_hours#values
Cheers Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190910/bdd770e1/attachment.html>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list