[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - appointment

[Simon Poole]

Am 10.09.2019 um 10:00 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> On 8. Sep 2019, at 22:11, Simon Poole <simon at poole.ch
> <mailto:simon at poole.ch>> wrote:
>
>> Isn't this semantically in the end not the same as "unknown" (as in any
>> application would have to equate this to  "you have to inquire if it is
>> open")?
>
>
> it may be the same for apps, it isn’t for mappers, “unknown” is an
> imperative for surveying it.

This is -not- supported by the existing documentation
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours#Summary_syntax


> It may also make a difference for some searching for such features,
> because unknown means you might be lucky and they’ll serve you, by
> appointment means you must not even try if they might be open.
>
That on the other hand might be a useful distinction.

Simon


> I welcome documenting this value, as it is already used with varying
> syntax more than 500 times, so it is clear mappers want
> it: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/opening_hours#values
>
> Cheers Martin 
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190911/34fedf7b/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190911/34fedf7b/attachment.sig>