[Tagging] Walking & Cycling Node Network tagging: undoing the hijacking of rcn and rwn
s8evq
s8evq at runbox.com
Tue Sep 10 17:47:46 UTC 2019
I see that network:type=node_network has been added to the wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:network%3Drwn&diff=next&oldid=1897551
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:route%3Dbicycle&diff=next&oldid=1866174
Was there consensus on this in the end? I didn't follow the whole discussion.
On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 16:52:47 +0200, Peter Elderson <pelderson at gmail.com> wrote:
> LS
> With the arrival of cycling node networks, the Dutch, German and Belgian
> mappers decided to claim (hijack) the network value rcn for those node
> networks. This exception was copied with the claim of network=rwn for the
> walking node networks.
>
> We are currently discussing in the three communities how to coreect this
> exception and return rcn and rwn to their intended use. To do that, we need
> another way to identify (members of) a route network as (members of) a node
> network.
>
> The network values identify transport mode and scope of routes, and these
> "dimensions" also apply to node networks. We do not want to add another
> dimension (configuration type) to the network=* values of routes.
>
> Instead, we are thnking about just adding a tag to identify segment routes
> as parts of a node network. The nodes themselves do not need this, since
> they ARE nodes and have a xxn_ref tag.
>
> In short, we are thinking to simply add the tag network_type=node_network
> (or network:type=node_network) to the node2node network routes. Nothing
> else has to change, which also means that renderers and data users who
> don't change anything, will not notice anything! But if they want they can
> make use of the separation and handle node networks different than non-node
> networks.
>
> Notice that no new key or value is proposed here. If new network config
> types arise, a new value for network_type can accommodate that.The method
> is applicable for all transport modes and geographical scopes.
>
> Thoughts, anyone? What did we forget? Shoot!
>
> Fr gr Peter Elderson
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
More information about the Tagging
mailing list