[Tagging] Open Defecation Areas

Warin 61sundowner at gmail.com
Wed Sep 11 10:25:42 UTC 2019


On 11/09/19 15:47, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
>
>
>
> 11 Sep 2019, 01:54 by pla16021 at gmail.com:
>
>     On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 at 23:41, Graeme Fitzpatrick
>     <graemefitz1 at gmail.com <mailto:graemefitz1 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
>         Would it need a multipolygon? My impression of the ODA is an
>         open patch of ground in / beside a residential area. If that
>         is the case, wouldn't it be much simpler to just mark a new
>         area in as landuse=o_d_a? (accept it wouldn't be abbreviated)
>
>
>     Overlapping landuse often works, but only because the carto people
>     juggle z-indexes
>     to make it work.  They're not overly happy doing that, I believe.
>
> well, reality is that sometimes area
> is actually both tree-covered area and
> for example university or residential area.

Trees are a land cover, not necessarily a land use.

Universities and residential areas are a land use.
>
>     It also doesn't always
>     work well: if ever you've put a pond in a wood without a
>     multipolygon you get
>     waterlogged trees.
>
> this is intentional to encourage correct
> mapping of tree-covered areas.

I wish there was more rendering that showed errors.
>
>       It also makes database queries somewhat more simpler if you're
>     asking what is at point A and you get one answer rather than two
>     answers, or one of
>     two answers chosen at random.
>
> note that in many cases getting two
> answers correctly represents reality
Or even 3..
Land cover e.g sand
Land use and e.g. quarry
Land form e.g. dune

>
>       A multipolygon is a little more work for the mapper,
>     but not much more.
>
>     Now I expect both the carto and db people to tell me I'm wrong
>     about that.  If they do,
>     I'll just point out that it's not wrong to use a multipolygon for this
>
> and in even more cases multipolygon
> should be used

Many people have problems with multipolygon relations..
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190911/368e8359/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list