[Tagging] "not:brand" to mark a shop that isn't part of a chain?
Tim Magee
timothy at eastlincoln.net
Sat Sep 14 14:53:23 UTC 2019
I would absolutely agree with this use case. Especially for cases such as the
regularly mentioned Burger King. If somebody from out of town is either
traveling through or armchair mapping they could be confused. If they are
using the ID editor, it suggests that you "upgrade the tags" which could lead
to a "Burger King" that is not part of the international Burger King tag
having the same brand:wikidata tag.
I also think that the not: namespace could be useful in other cases such as
not:name, so I support it.
-Tim
On Saturday, September 14, 2019 9:57:32 AM EDT Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
> I think "not:brand" and "not:brand:wikidata" should only be used when
> the name of the feature or the brand of the feature is identical (or
> nearly identical) to a well-known brand.
>
> - Joseph
>
> On 9/14/19, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I am leaning to supporting the tag, because it offers a standard way to
> > give specific hints for some special cases. The risk is that the tag could
> > in theory be added with infinite value lists to any object, but we should
> > not expect it to happen ;-)
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Martin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190914/10a5af05/attachment.sig>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list