[Tagging] Was there every a proposal for the disused:key=* / abandoned:key=* lifecycle prefixes?

[Graeme Fitzpatrick]

On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 at 02:52, Kevin Kenny <kevin.b.kenny at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> I've also mapped things like 'disused:amenity=prison
> landuse=brownfield' for a now-closed prison that the state is trying
> to find a buyer to redevelop. The buildings are still standing (and I
> understand are for the most part structurally sound), but what would a
> buyer do with them?
>

Legal offices would seem the most appropriate? :-)

Going back to the disused / abandoned discussion, is this a good time to
ask about destroyed:?

A tourism establishment in our area has just been destroyed by a bushfire
:-(

It's planned to rebuild on the same spot, so I've marked the existing
tourism=guest_house & amenity=restaurant tags as destroyed:, together with
a "description" note. This has removed them from the map. Is that the right
way of doing it?

The associated camping ground wasn't damaged in any way (beyond losing
power & telephone lines) but is also temporarily closed for "a while"
pending road repairs & re-connection of power etc.

What's the best way of marking that?

Thanks

Graeme
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190927/521509f4/attachment.html>