[Tagging] Was there every a proposal for the disused:key=* / abandoned:key=* lifecycle prefixes?

[Paul Allen]

On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 at 08:10, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> > On 27. Sep 2019, at 13:52, Paul Allen <pla16021 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Another counter-argument: we don't have any tag indicating residential
> usage other
> > than building=house
>
> we do, there are terrace, duplex, villa, apartments, caravan, detached and
> probably more. They are implying residential purpose just the same as does
> „house“.
>

And they are all building=*.  We can have building=industrial +
amenity=place_of_worship +
religion=christian for a church in a unit on an industrial estate.  We
don't have that
orthogonality for residential uses.  Yes, there's building:use (which
didn't go through an
approval process) but it's not orthogonal to tags like amenity=*.

-- 
Paul
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190930/c3c0b088/attachment.html>