[Tagging] Refining heritage tag

[António Madeira]

Thanks, Paul.
I'll contact them then.


Às 17:44 de 14/04/2020, Paul Allen escreveu:
> On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 21:02, António Madeira <antoniomadeira at gmx.com
> <mailto:antoniomadeira at gmx.com>> wrote:
>
>
>     Às 10:15 de 14/04/2020, Paul Allen escreveu:
>>
>>     They're the ones you'd have to convince to alter their code to
>>     handle your
>>     proposed change.
>
>     You mean this?
>     https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Historical_Map
>
>
> That's where it's documented.  The map is here:gk.historic.place
> <http://gk.historic.place>  If
> you've not played with it before, here's a place where I've added most
> of the heritage info:
> http://gk.historic.place/historische_objekte/l/en/index.html?zoom=16&lat=52.03846&lon=-4.46621&detail=3&pid=HaHbHcSaHe
>
>     The "problem" with criteria is that it seems to be used with
>     numbers or abbreviations, like a list that corresponds to some
>     longer definitions.
>
>
> That's how others have done it, listing what those abbreviations mean
> on the wiki
> page.  But there's nothing (I can see) that says you have to restrict
> yourself to
> abbreviations.
>
> Since heritage=* is largely ruled over by the historical places
> people, the best
> place to get an opinion is https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/lutz
> In the end, he and his team decide how the historical places map interpret
> the tags.
>
> --
> Paul
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200414/e4fc7909/attachment-0001.htm>