[Tagging] Refining heritage tag

[António Madeira]

After communicating with lutz from Historic.Place, he told me they
didn't create this heritage scheme, they just adopted it.
I took the opportunity to present him my proposal of refining this
scheme and I got his support to go ahead with it, so I'm presenting it
here in order to make the necessary adjustments with a new proposal.

heritage=* - This is the main tag, which uses the admin_level [not changed].
heritage:operator=xxx - This is the tag for the official operator. I
propose using separators [;] in those cases where an heritage has an
international and a national operator.
heritage:ref:xxx=* - This tag is for the code/number reference of the
operator(s) above. It changes the previous ref:xxx=*
heritage:xxx:criteria=* - This tag is for the classification criteria
used by the xxx operator. It changes the previous xxx:criteria=*
heritage:xxx:inscription_date=* - This tag is used for the date the
heritage was officially registered by xxx operator. It changes the
previous xxx:inscription_date=*
heritage:xxx:designation_title=* - This tag is used for the heritage
title (international or national). This is new and is an attempt to
circumvent the use of protection_title=* which is wrong in this context.
heritage:xxx:website=* - Used for the heritage official website
(international or national).


Regards,
António.


Às 17:49 de 14/04/2020, António Madeira via Tagging escreveu:
> Thanks, Paul.
> I'll contact them then.
>
>
> Às 17:44 de 14/04/2020, Paul Allen escreveu:
>> On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 21:02, António Madeira <antoniomadeira at gmx.com
>> <mailto:antoniomadeira at gmx.com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>     Às 10:15 de 14/04/2020, Paul Allen escreveu:
>>>
>>>     They're the ones you'd have to convince to alter their code to
>>>     handle your
>>>     proposed change.
>>
>>     You mean this?
>>     https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Historical_Map
>>
>>
>> That's where it's documented.  The map is here:gk.historic.place
>> <http://gk.historic.place>  If
>> you've not played with it before, here's a place where I've added most
>> of the heritage info:
>> http://gk.historic.place/historische_objekte/l/en/index.html?zoom=16&lat=52.03846&lon=-4.46621&detail=3&pid=HaHbHcSaHe
>>
>>     The "problem" with criteria is that it seems to be used with
>>     numbers or abbreviations, like a list that corresponds to some
>>     longer definitions.
>>
>>
>> That's how others have done it, listing what those abbreviations mean
>> on the wiki
>> page.  But there's nothing (I can see) that says you have to restrict
>> yourself to
>> abbreviations.
>>
>> Since heritage=* is largely ruled over by the historical places
>> people, the best
>> place to get an opinion is https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/lutz
>> In the end, he and his team decide how the historical places map
>> interpret
>> the tags.
>>
>> --
>> Paul
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200416/d31b0f24/attachment.htm>