[Tagging] Refining heritage tag

[António Madeira]

Now that I've read the German wiki more carefully, I realized that they
consider World Heritage not only as natural areas but also for
buildings, although they clearly state "Always with *boundary
<https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&hl=en&pto=aue&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=auto&sp=nmt4&tl=en&u=https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:boundary&usg=ALkJrhhEUN-MoIJGgAdXTrSklsbYuj2xxA>=protected_area
<https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&hl=en&pto=aue&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=auto&sp=nmt4&tl=en&u=https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:boundary%253Dprotected_area&usg=ALkJrhhGpsP3H2u_y7ymjr1mgIIw8CX43Q>*"
which makes this somewhat confuse... I don't mind at all to use
"protection_title", but I prefer not to create unnecessary conflicts.


Às 20:43 de 17/04/2020, Martin Koppenhoefer escreveu:
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 18. Apr 2020, at 01:04, Paul Allen <pla16021 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> The fraction of heritage POIs which are
>> protected areas is less than 1%.
>
> I still don’t see why we would need a new tag heritage_title rather than the established protection_title
> Maybe protected “area” is a strange tag for a building, but this doesn’t extend to protection_title, or are there objects where we would need both tags?
>
> Cheers Martin

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200417/5bed6e52/attachment.htm>