[Tagging] Refining heritage tag

[Paul Allen]

On Sat, 18 Apr 2020 at 00:43, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
wrote:

I still don’t see why we would need a new tag heritage_title rather than
> the established protection_title##
>

>From  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:protection_title

    Requires
        boundary=national_park
        boundary=protected_area

So not applicable to heritage=*.

Admittedly, the wiki page for protected_area states that it can be used
on heritage sites, but when you read through the rest of the page it's
not talking about buildings.  Or even a castle complex.  It's talking about
things like "registered historic landscapes" (a UK term), which are
historic and therefor e have heritage value, but aren't covered by the
existing heritage=* key.  Instead they're covered by
boundary=protected_area (I think).

The heritage=* and boundary=protected_area are pretty much orthogonal
in what they cover.  There might be cases where both tags apply but they
are going to be exceptions rather than the rule.

-- 
Paul
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200418/20837020/attachment.htm>