[Tagging] Refining heritage tag

[António Madeira]

So, I would like to know what would be the technical pros and cons
regarding heritage:ref:operator=* vs ref:operator=* , i.e. the database
use, rendering, consulting, exporting etc.


Às 21:04 de 17/04/2020, Paul Allen escreveu:
> On Sat, 18 Apr 2020 at 00:43, Martin Koppenhoefer
> <dieterdreist at gmail.com <mailto:dieterdreist at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     I still don’t see why we would need a new tag heritage_title
>     rather than the established protection_title##
>
>
> From https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:protection_title
>
>     Requires
>         boundary=national_park
>         boundary=protected_area
>
> So not applicable to heritage=*.
>
> Admittedly, the wiki page for protected_area states that it can be used
> on heritage sites, but when you read through the rest of the page it's
> not talking about buildings.  Or even a castle complex. It's talking about
> things like "registered historic landscapes" (a UK term), which are
> historic and therefor e have heritage value, but aren't covered by the
> existing heritage=* key.  Instead they're covered by
> boundary=protected_area (I think).
>
> The heritage=* and boundary=protected_area are pretty much orthogonal
> in what they cover.  There might be cases where both tags apply but they
> are going to be exceptions rather than the rule.
>
> --
> Paul
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200420/3d480c2c/attachment.htm>