[Tagging] Too many different features lumped together under amenity=social_facility?

[Paul Allen]

On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 at 17:23, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Am Mo., 20. Apr. 2020 um 16:27 Uhr schrieb Paul Allen <pla16021 at gmail.com
> >:
>
> Why on earth should we have this second level tagging for social
> facilities but have almost all the other tags in a flat system (not
> amenity=educational_institution, educational_institution=school/university,
> and not shop=service_provider service_provider=hairdresser / car_repair),
>

Because "amenity" has come to mean "miscellaneous."

without the need to type longish keys with underscores on mobile devices ;-)
>

Why not have everything under amenity?  Roads, footpaths, buildings, shops,
parks, playgrounds, hospitals, etc?

Maybe you need a better editing app on your mobile device. :)

-- 
Paul
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200420/0b7aa369/attachment.htm>