[Tagging] RFC: service=? for all highway=service (service=parking needed, primarily, I think)

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Sun Aug 2 22:30:32 UTC 2020

sent from a phone

> On 3. Aug 2020, at 00:18, Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefitz1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> So what all these have in common is that they are not public roads not
>> intended for through-traffic. They are all on private/public properties.
>> So maybe they could be summarized under service=property, with a
>> description like "roads on (private) large properties, such as on
>> hospital grounds, cemeteries, camping grounds, industrial or commercial
>> areas"
> That's a nice idea!

not all “service without additional subclass” are on properties, while most of those that already have additional subclasses like service=driveway/parking_aisle/drive_through etc. usually are. IMHO “property” would be misleading as qualifier for more important service roads
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200803/44f1d477/attachment.htm>

More information about the Tagging mailing list