[Tagging] kerb=regular vs. raised
61sundowner at gmail.com
Mon Aug 3 00:13:42 UTC 2020
On 2/8/20 5:41 pm, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> sent from a phone
>> On 2. Aug 2020, at 03:55, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Much easier to tag the numerical height of the curb as this avoids the confusion of words, particularly with different languages, cultures and climates.
> this would require a lot of measurements, while a few classes of heights could generally be determined by looking at it. It also might require splitting the kerbs when there a variations of just a few centimeters. While tagging actual heights explicitly is fine, it is not a general alternative to tagging lowered kerb / higher than normally expected kerb.
The point is that a 'normally expected curb' may be a considerable obstacle to a wheelchair person. And the purpose of this tagging is to indicate wheelchair access difficulties.
If someone wants to map those variations, let them. Most curb heights are not mapped, indeed most curbs are not mapped.
So having someone spend time mapping minor variations may indicate that they think this is important.
Once the 'regular' curb height is measured then it is a simple matter, for most who are not concerned with minor variations, to estimate curbs of similar height in the same area.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging