[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - more parking types

Matthew Woehlke mwoehlke.floss at gmail.com
Fri Aug 7 13:40:31 UTC 2020


On 07/08/2020 09.06, Paul Allen wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Aug 2020 at 13:53, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
>> Well, yes, voting "no" is probably not useful, but this is also the
>> least "interesting" bit of the proposal. The purpose here would be just
>> to bless the tag with "status=approved" rather than "status=de-facto".
> 
> But it wasn't approved by a formal vote.  If you mark it status=approved
> then it ought to be possible to find the vote that approved it.

Ahem:

"The purpose [of including parking_space=disabled as an element of the 
proposal] would be [so that, if the proposal passes, we can] bless the 
tag with 'status=approved' rather than 'status=de-facto'."

Was some part of that unclear?

The proposal under discussion in this thread *would be* the 
aforementioned approval vote.

-- 
Matthew



More information about the Tagging mailing list