[Tagging] Canopy Walkways

[Jake Edmonds]

Should the key be bridge? 
I feel like canopy walkways are more like bridges than boardwalks. 

Sent from Jake Edmonds' iPhone

> On 22 Aug 2020, at 11:08, Alan Mackie <aamackie at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Fri, 21 Aug 2020, 21:46 Martin Koppenhoefer, <dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> sent from a phone
>> 
>> > On 21. Aug 2020, at 22:25, Andy Mabbett <andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote:
>> > 
>> > "public building" and "trunk highway" are also common terms.
>> > 
>> > Do we tag
>> > 
>> >    building=public_building
>> > 
>> > or
>> > 
>> >    highway=trunk_hghway
>> 
>> 
>> these are different because it would be a literal repetition. What we do is footway=sidewalk rather than „side“
>> 
>> If general opinion is towards footway=canopy I could live with it, but my preference goes to canopy_walkway
>> I’m not expecting so many that the extra characters will be significant ;-)
> 
> 
> I have had to remind myself several times as this thread has developed that this is not intended as a synonym for breezeway or other covered=yes footways. 
> 
> If the previously suggested =treetop isn't accurate perhaps a more explicit =forest_canopy ?
> 
>> 
>> Cheers Martin 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200822/8202bbbc/attachment.htm>