[Tagging] Tagging multiple images on one object

Thibault Molleman thibaultmolleman at gmail.com
Wed Aug 26 12:53:12 UTC 2020


Btw, I want to make it clear that I have nothing against the wikimedia
foundation. I think it's fair that they moderate like they do, because
their capacity isn't unlimited

On Wed, Aug 26, 2020, 14:51 Thibault Molleman <thibaultmolleman at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Can you link photos/deletion requests?
>
> Again, don't bother with that. I was 13, didn't know what I was doing,
> main reason why they were deleted according to the deletion requests were
> because they didn't have a license attached to them, so they didn't know if
> it was even allowed on there. (wouldn't happen with todays upload wizard)
>
>  Assuming the drinking fountains are unique
>
>
> I feel like it just shouldn't matter if they are unique. We shouldn't have
> to justify why an image is important.
> The fact that the image is linked to an osm node is enough reason for the
> image to be online. But the problem is that Wikimedia wouldn't care for
> such a reason.
> So that is the reason why I would always archive.org images I'd put on
> Commons probably
>
> Cheers,
> Thibault
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020, 14:45 Jake Edmonds via Tagging <
> tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
>> I feel like those examples (city gates and fountains) would be
>> appropriate places to use a wikimedia category.
>>
>> Assuming the drinking fountains are unique, if not then do they need
>> multiple photos?
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>> Sent from Jake Edmonds' iPhone
>>
>> > On 26 Aug 2020, at 14:29, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > 
>> >
>> > sent from a phone
>> >
>> >> On 26. Aug 2020, at 12:18, bkil <bkil.hu+Aq at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> there is usually no need for more than one image on a POI
>> >
>> >
>> > I have recently tagged some city gates and both sides would have been
>> interesting. The other kind of POI I am frequently taking photos are
>> fountains and drinking fountains, where indeed a single foto is completely
>> sufficient in almost all cases. It’s not generally answerable.
>> >
>> > Cheers Martin
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Tagging mailing list
>> > Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200826/4a9dd23a/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list