[Tagging] Feature Proposal Rejected - RFC - Admission
Lukas Richert
lrichert at posteo.de
Tue Dec 1 11:37:09 UTC 2020
IMO the word 'issue' here only makes sense if I read your description -
encountering it out in the wild, I would have no idea what is meant
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/issue.
The usage of issue as a verb is not all too common without further
specification and goes against typical OSM tagging, which usually uses
nouns as descriptors. Even then, the usage of issue as a verb is
typically used in the sense of "to flow out".
Perhaps 'distribution' or 'distributor' would work? Or simply 'sale'
even in cases where the fee is zero.
Simply ignoring this "issue" isn't helpful :P
Best regards, Lukas
On 01/12/2020 12:21, Janko Mihelić wrote:
> I fixed the wiki of the proposal, any new comments before I start the
> voting again?
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Admission
> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Admission>
>
> Janko
>
> čet, 26. stu 2020. u 16:43 Janko Mihelić <janjko at gmail.com
> <mailto:janjko at gmail.com>> napisao je:
>
> Results: 1 approved, 6 opposed, 3 abstained.
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Admission
> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Admission>
>
> No one was opposed to the core idea of the Admission proposal,
> just technicalities. So we should go over them and later try again:
>
> 1. access=admisson
> This was the biggest problem, five voters opposed because of it.
> People were asking why not the more established access=customers
> or access=permit.
> I thought about access=admission to be an entrance into the
> admission scheme, after which the router searches for the
> relation. But maybe that isn't needed, so mappers can put
> access=customer, access=permit, or access=admission if it passes
> in a separate proposal. Wiki user Lectrician1 proposed
> access=customer + customer=admission which sounds ok for when
> admission is not free.
>
> 2. the word "issue" for role
> Three voters thought this word is strange for a place that gives
> you tickets or other admission tokens. They thought
> "issuing_place", "issuing_authority", "issuer", "ticket" or
> "voucher" would be better. I still think "issue" is the easiest to
> remember, and to combine in different tags like issue:website=*.
>
> Thanks for your comments,
> Janko
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20201201/974dfd83/attachment.htm>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list