[Tagging] RFC - Hazards - 2 Week Update & RFC Summary

[Brian M. Sperlongano]

> I'd suggest fallen_rock and low_flying_aircraft as tag values based upon
>
the common case but have the proposal mention their secondary application.
>

I actually have low_flying_aircraft in the proposal as a value, though I
just discovered that there is a more common value in use, "air_traffic" (88
usages).  However, I agree with the suggestions that low_flying_aircraft is
the better tag value and will add "air_traffic" to the deprecation list.

I will wait to see if I hear more from others about fallen vs falling
rocks, but I note your comments and Kevin's also.


> I think there may be other hazard warning signs in that document for you to
> consider.
>

Many of the signs on that list are already described by other tags.  For
example, the "yield" sign is covered by highway=give_way.  In general, I
think we have that list pretty well covered, though there may be one or two
more obscure cases.  Are there specific signs you feel are missing from the
hazard key?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20201209/b1f4d8c0/attachment.htm>