[Tagging] Fuzzy areas again: should we have them or not?

[stevea]

On Dec 22, 2020, at 12:10 AM, Anders Torger <anders at torger.se> wrote:
> I've read all, there are points I don't agree with or think is unfair, but I won't reply to these type of posts any more as it only becomes about my character, not the subject as such. The subject is about names in nature and their dependency on fuzzy areas, and if we should have them or not, or if there are other better solutions. As it is of strategic character, I don't think it's worthwhile to draft proposals before there is some sort of consensus on the problem it tries to solve and the broad overall method to solve it.

I don’t wish to attack anybody’s character.  I do wish to see constructive discussion that leads (here, on this list) to better tagging and strategies to achieve this.  If that goes off track (and it sometimes does, as “people differences," international communication channels like this and other factors can frustrate even our best attempts) somebody here can (and should) say something, the best outcome being that we get the thread of conversation back on track.

“Names in nature” is an interesting, complex, challenging, yes, even strategic topic.  I think we can get closer to “better,” here on this list, with good, respectful, effective dialog.  I look forward to that.