[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - addr:interpolation on closed ways and nodes

[Joseph Eisenberg]

Re: " for addresses the increment ought to default to 2, since that is most
commonly encountered."

That is true in England, but might not be true in the world at large. It's
not common in Indonesia.

On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 6:12 AM Paul Allen <pla16021 at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 24 Dec 2020 at 10:14, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> maybe we should add an expression marker, like {10..20} to make it more
>> explicit and avoid confusion with typos?
>>
>
> In programming, you also have the ability to define the increment,
> which defaults to 1 if left unspecified.  That way you can distinguish
> between 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 10, 12, 14, 16 (or even
> 10, 13, 16).  You could argue that for addresses the increment
> ought to default to 2, since that is most commonly encountered.
>
> --
> Paul
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20201224/2b326730/attachment.htm>