[Tagging] Proposed feature - RFC - Military Bases

Graeme Fitzpatrick graemefitz1 at gmail.com
Fri Dec 25 21:35:00 UTC 2020


On Fri, 25 Dec 2020 at 21:32, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:

> building=military
>

Transcribing talk comments:

Yes, if you can identify what the purpose of that building is, then use a
specific tag. I originally had it just as building=yes to cover those rare
cases when you may find a military building sitting by itself, without any
form of perimeter fencing (if there's a fenced area, it will become
landuse=military etc), but then found building=military. There have been
other comments made about specifying things as closely as possible for data
purposes, so I think building=military would be better than just
building=yes

Thanks

Graeme
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20201226/5d63f394/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list