[Tagging] Fuzzy areas again: should we have them or not?

[80hnhtv4agou at bk.ru]

the login is different, and a new account, unlike Wikipedia where anyone can post on a talk,vote page.

  
>Saturday, December 26, 2020 4:19 PM -06:00 from Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>:
> 
> 
>sent from a phone
>  
>>On 24. Dec 2020, at 17:21, Tomas Straupis < tomasstraupis at gmail.com > wrote:
>> 
>> It is not a technical problem.
>>
>> Where are several ways in principle:
>> 1. Full democracy - you need thousands of people to vote - hard to do.
>> 2. Weighted democracy - vote is multiplied by some coefficient - say
>>by number of edits (but should somehow include other value for OSM
>>like writing, organising, administering, chapioning etc.) - you would
>>need less votes as it will be enough to get votes of high
>>contributors, but will have difficulty/controversy when writing
>>formula and getting values for the coefficient (especially when
>>evaluating non tangible things like championing).
>> 3. Expert lead - experts committee is elected (having real expertise
>>in the field as well as OSM) - hard to find experts willing to do this
>>and as has already been demonstrated experts will be massively
>>outnumbered so it will be hard to force non experts to follow their
>>decisions. Also this could probably be against "OSM as a free and open
>>society for everyone". 
> 
> 
>4. liquid democracy, have people delegate their votes by topic if they don’t want to vote themselves.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquid_democracy
> 
>Cheers Martin 
>_______________________________________________
>Tagging mailing list
>Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging 
 
 
 
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20201227/beb0d007/attachment.htm>