[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - addr:interpolation on closed ways and nodes

[Brian M. Sperlongano]

+1 and I commented as such on the talk page.  I'd like to see even/odd/all
get dropped and go with interval=2 (or whatever number >1), with the
default interval=1 being presumed.

On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 6:36 PM Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 24. Dec 2020, at 15:40, Peter Elderson <pelderson at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Option 1
> > addr:range=* specifies the increment
> >
> > addr:range=even
> > addr:housenumber=2..250
>
>
> apart from the term (interval etc.), I think if we already go the way and
> define a range syntax, it should also be capable to store the interval,
> rather than using a separate tag for it.
> e.g. {10..20..1} every number from 10 to 20,
> {10..20..2} only every second number.
>
> no need to state odd or even, as this is implicit. {11..15} even does not
> make sense.
>
> Cheers Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20201226/24c4f88e/attachment-0001.htm>