[Tagging] Proposed feature - RFC - Military Bases

[Mateusz Konieczny]

Dec 27, 2020, 22:49 by dieterdreist at gmail.com:

>
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 25. Dec 2020, at 22:37, Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefitz1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> but then found building=military. There have been other comments made about specifying things as closely as possible for data purposes, so I think building=military would be better than just building=yes
>>
>
>
> I am not overly enthusiastic about building=military 
> It’s very generic and not really a building type, rather a group of building types, like building=residential which can be apartments, detached houses, dorms, villas, duplex, skyscrapers, etc.
>
Yes, but sometimes it will be useful like building=residential is sometimes useful in
"it is something residential, unable to specify in more detail, I give up" fashion

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20201227/826554a3/attachment.htm>