[Tagging] Proposed feature - RFC - Military Bases

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

sent from a phone

> On 25. Dec 2020, at 22:37, Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefitz1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> but then found building=military. There have been other comments made about specifying things as closely as possible for data purposes, so I think building=military would be better than just building=yes


I am not overly enthusiastic about building=military 
It’s very generic and not really a building type, rather a group of building types, like building=residential which can be apartments, detached houses, dorms, villas, duplex, skyscrapers, etc.

Cheers Martin