[Tagging] Non-historic static aircraft

[Mateusz Konieczny]

Dec 27, 2020, 23:51 by graemefitz1 at gmail.com:

>
>
>
>
> On Mon, 28 Dec 2020 at 08:06, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <> tagging at openstreetmap.org> > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Dec 27, 2020, 11:32 by >> theswavu at gmail.com>> :
>>
>>>
>>> Neither of those are aircraft. They're both full size mock-ups for training. 
>>>
>
> Thanks, Andrew - I was only looking at aerial imagery so wasn't aware of that 
>
>>>
>>>
>> in this case man_made=aircraft would be a poor choice
>>
>> man_made=aircraft_mockup ?
>>
>
> man_made=training_simulator / _simulation / _aid ?
>
This is much broader and covers many other objects
(for example tram cabin simulator). 
What may be a good or bad thing.

_aid seems far to extreme, it can cover far too many things.

>>
>>
>>> You wouldn't be able to get either of them off the ground.
>>>
>> This is true also for many historic aircraft that were flying
>> some time ago.
>>
>
> I know of one that is a non-flying replica, built for filming, now in place as a memorial to an air crash
> https://oreillys.com.au/uncategorized/stinson-replica-plane-restoration-january-2017/
>
> historic=aircraft or historic=memorial?
>
It is a mockup in a shape of a plane, not an actual plane, right?

In such case it is rather memorial (or maybe artwork? or monument?), definitely
not a historic=aircraft

> It is actually currently mapped as a badly-drawn building > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/326157997>  (with an incorrect note) & also tagged as a historic=aircraft > https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4343830716
>
Yeah, it would be nice to fix this. I contributed a bit better forest area
(converted to multipolygon and excluded area without trees).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20201228/56691887/attachment.htm>