[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - addr:interpolation on closed ways and nodes

[Brian M. Sperlongano]

In that case, I would think that a range/interval scheme simply wouldn't
apply, and you'd need to tag each one.  Unless there's some kind of
reliable rule that can be composed.  Though I could see there being an
address range like "23a|23e" as being quite viable.

On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 6:54 PM Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 27. Dec 2020, at 00:40, Brian M. Sperlongano <zelonewolf at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 and I commented as such on the talk page.  I'd like to see
> even/odd/all get dropped and go with interval=2 (or whatever number >1),
> with the default interval=1 being presumed.
>
>
>
> an additional complexity around here arises from numbers that subsequently
> were squeezed into the numbering, so that you cannot actually know how many
> numbers there are between 23 and 27, there could be just 25, or also 23a,
> 23b, 23c, 23d and 23e
>
> Cheers Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20201227/960fc155/attachment.htm>