[Tagging] Power Storage Proposal (RFC)

[Lukas Richert]

There are batteries or rather energy storage devices based on 
gravitational, mechanical or kinematical approaches such as flywheels, 
compressed_air etc. The question is how broadly we would define battery 
I think? It could either be broadly defined as any device storing energy 
or as "devices containing an electric cell or a series of electric cells 
storing chemical energy that can be converted into electrical power". 
Perhaps a boader power=energy_storage would be more suitable?

On 29.12.20 10:49, Warin wrote:
> On 29/12/20 8:23 pm, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>> sent from a phone
>>
>>> On 29. Dec 2020, at 10:16, François Lacombe<fl.infosreseaux at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm not happy with things like generator:storage:type=lithium-ion and would really prefer power=battery + battery=lithium-ion + storage=electrochemical
>> are there also batteries that aren’t based on electrochemical principles?
>
>
> ?? I  think they are all chemical.
>> I would believe we could somehow combine the tags  storage=electrochemical and power=battery into one tag, possibly by simply omitting one of them?
> There are a few ideas around, lets see if there are any more before reducing the options?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20201229/6448f8c6/attachment.htm>