[Tagging] Power Storage Proposal (RFC)

[Warin]

On 30/12/20 11:31 pm, Christian Pietzsch wrote:
>
> I think type as I use it in the proposal fits quite well. After all it 
> groups up devices with similar properties. This also fits with the use 
> of method and type in the Wikipedia article about power storage. 
> Method is the physical principals used (electrochemical,thermal,....) 
> while types are the specific devices invented based on these 
> principals (like batteries, that are based on electrochemics), which 
> have sub-types (like lithium-ion for batteries).
>

Will it be used for both the 'method of storage' AND the 'device used to 
store energy'???

If so, will not that be confusing - one mapper might tag the method of 
storage, while a different mapper might tag the device used to store 
energy for the same thing.


Chose one or the other .. and then use that in place of 'type'.


[You may know what you mean. People coming later may well misconstrue 
the simple one word that is left for them to understand.]


> -Christian
>
> 29. Dezember 2020 23:32, "Warin" <61sundowner at gmail.com 
> <mailto:61sundowner at gmail.com?to=%22Warin%22%20<61sundowner at gmail.com>>> 
> schrieb:
>
>     On 30/12/20 2:13 am, Christian Pietzsch wrote:
>>
>>     looking at my original proposal I had some ideas of simplyfing it
>>     and reducing tagging.
>>     things would be put under the subtag storage:type
>>     <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Power_storage#Tagging>
>>
>     Again .. not 'type' ... type mean what exactly? storage method?
>     storage device?
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20201231/059b0f46/attachment.htm>