[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Tax free shopping

Hauke Stieler mail at hauke-stieler.de
Sat Jan 4 22:46:40 UTC 2020


> Absence of such facilities surely applies to 99.9999% of shops. 
> Nobody is going to want to start to tag the absence of such a service?

Of course nobody would start to do that, but when having "=yes", then I
think there should be a "=no" (even though this is the default case).

And when I think of Reykjavik: Many souvenir-shops will give you
prepared tax-reund-forms and information leaflets, but not all (I don't
know, maybe 50/50). Reykjavik is not that large, so tagging the one half
with "=refund" (or whatever it might be) and the other half with "=no"
would make sense to me.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200104/fdb9a929/attachment-0001.sig>

More information about the Tagging mailing list