[Tagging] recreational vs functional routes

[Peter Elderson]

Florimond Berthoux <florimond.berthoux at gmail.com> het volgende geschreven:
> 
> 
> Ok, you need examples :
> this Eurovelo 3 is for tourism https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9351172#map=12/48.8454/2.4130&layers=C
> this REVe Nord-Sud is for commute/every day cycling https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8664006#map=14/48.8784/2.3599&layers=C as you can see in this video https://youtu.be/1dGtSZbUKew
> and this is for road cycling https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/163270#map=15/48.8577/2.2333&layers=C as you can see in this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VLwNlVjTOKU
> 

I can't see the signposting of the routes in the videos, I assume because I don't know where to look? 

> Of course nobody will blame you if you use a touristic route for commuting, and adding a tag tourism=yes doesn’t imply it can’t be used by every day cyclists.
> 
> What the point? If you are a commuter you’ll focus on fast and safe route, so you’ll prefer REVe Nord-Sud than Eurovelo 3 at this place https://www.cyclosm.org/#map=18/48.86796/2.35391/cyclosm 
> For instance, this information can be used for rendering map (like CyclOSM on which I work) or routers (a tourist profile routing will prefer tourism route).

(just playing devil's advocate)
Wouldn't renderers and routers prefer road attributes? 

>> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200109/a8eecc78/attachment-0001.htm>