[Tagging] recreational vs functional routes
bradhaack at fastmail.com
Mon Jan 13 18:20:42 UTC 2020
On 1/12/20 4:23 PM, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
> Paris is the capital of France because it has all the main government
> facilities: the legislature, the executive, the judiciary and most
> Routes that are mapped in Openstreetmap need to be signed or marked in
> a visible way. Otherwise every Stava user will add their favorite
> training loop to the map as a running route or road cycling route.
I think this is an overreaction. There are many routes that meet the
wiki description (and my own reasonableness test) that are not signed or
marked. I do see many routes in my area that should not be routes,
but that is only a minor annoyance.
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 2:02 AM Florimond Berthoux
> <florimond.berthoux at gmail.com <mailto:florimond.berthoux at gmail.com>>
> Asking me how do I know that Eurovelo 3 is for tourism or bicycle
> trekking is like asking me how do I know that Paris is the capital
> of France.
> « Is there a sign saying that Paris is the capital of France? May
> be we should remove that tag, don't you think?... »
> You don't need sign post to have a route, do you have a sign post
> at the intersection of those routes ?
> I doubt that.
> This is how the Wiki define a route:
> « A *route* is a customary or regular line of passage or travel,
> often predetermined and publicized. Routes consist of paths taken
> repeatedly by people and vehicles: a ship on the North Atlantic
> route, a car on a numbered road, a bus on its route or a cyclist
> on a national route. »
> So to paraphrase this for road biking route :
> « A road bicycle *route* is a customary or regular line of passage
> or travel, often predetermined and publicized as such. Road
> bicycle routes consist of paths taken repeatedly by road cyclist. »
> And if you don't know then don't tag it and don't manage it.
> Le sam. 11 janv. 2020 à 23:35, Joseph Eisenberg
> <joseph.eisenberg at gmail.com <mailto:joseph.eisenberg at gmail.com>> a
> écrit :
> > > I am not against distinguishing more types of cycling routes,
> I am all for it, as long as it's verifyable, mappable with clear
> tagging, and manageable.
> > +1
> > I started using Openstreetmap because I wanted to add touring routes
> > and recreational bike routes in RideWithGPS and then found out that
> > http://ridewithgps.com uses Openstreetmap data which I could
> edit. And
> > I get to work and take kids to school and shop by bike - I haven't
> > owned a car for 9 years.
> > So I would love to have more information about what streets and
> > are best for getting from point A to B, and which ones are nice for
> > training rides and which ones are fun for tours.
> > But tags have to be verifiable: if the next mapper can't confirm
> > a tag as right, the data in Openstreetmap will not be maintained
> > properly. Subjective tags cannot work.
> > I have seen this happen: before I mapped here, I used to try to
> > improve the bike routes in Portland Oregon for Google Maps. But
> > there was no definition of a "preferred" bicycle street, and it was
> > hard to delete a preferred route once it was added, the bike
> layer was
> > full of disconnected segments. Some were from old city maps of bike
> > routes, some were based on the personal preference of the
> mapper, and
> > some were actually signed or marked on the ground, but you couldn't
> > tell them apart.
> > If there is a sign or marking that specifies that a certain route is
> > designed for mountain bikes or for bike racing, then sure, you
> can tag
> > that. But most bike routes do not have anything to specify that they
> > are more for commuting or more for recreation, and in that case we
> > can't tag the distinction.
> > Fortunately, database users (like routing applications) can look at
> > other Openstreetmap data, like surface=* tags on ways, and external
> > data like elevation models, to determine if a route is a difficult
> > single-track trail through the hills versus a flat paved path
> along a
> > canal, and use this to help route cyclists appropriately.
> > - Joseph Eisenberg
> Florimond Berthoux
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging