[Tagging] building=disused

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Wed Jan 15 10:58:27 UTC 2020

14 Jan 2020, 20:02 by selfishseahorse at gmail.com:

> On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 at 19:44, Kevin Kenny <> kevin.b.kenny at gmail.com> > wrote:
> Actually, i never use disused: on businesses because it feels wrong;
It is OK for shops that are closed, but where their signage still remains.

> either i remove them or i prefix them with was: . For example,
Shops that are gone without a trace almost always can be simply deleted.
I encountered cases of destroyed building remapped from aerials,
so leaving demolished:building=* geometry + note=* makes sense.

But is there a real danger of people mapping shops based on their outdated memories?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200115/c3664ada/attachment.htm>

More information about the Tagging mailing list