[Tagging] building=disused

Paul Allen pla16021 at gmail.com
Thu Jan 16 15:48:15 UTC 2020


On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 14:55, Mateusz Konieczny <matkoniecz at tutanota.com>
wrote:

>
> 16 Jan 2020, 02:22 by 61sundowner at gmail.com:
>
> If the 'standard map' starts rendering 'disused=yes' the same way as
> 'disused:*=*' (presently not rendered) then what?
>
> Then standard map style will be fixed to
> remove this bug.
>

I took Warin's question to mean what would happen if standard carto
deliberately chose to handle disused=yes the same way as
disused:*=*.  Therefore not a bug to be fixed, but an intentional
permanent change to behaviour.

If that happened, I would stop marking physical objects as disused.  The
fact that a physical object exists, and is therefore rendered, is far more
important than whether it is in use or not.  I suspect many mappers would
do the same.  I'd add a note saying that it's disused, so might many other
mappers.  But notes are free-form, so they may use words other than
"disused."  That would make it harder to craft reliable queries to find or
ignore disused objects of a particular type.

-- 
Paul
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200116/d38ba236/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list