[Tagging] building=disused

Warin 61sundowner at gmail.com
Thu Jan 16 22:36:02 UTC 2020

On 17/1/20 2:48 am, Paul Allen wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 14:55, Mateusz Konieczny 
> <matkoniecz at tutanota.com <mailto:matkoniecz at tutanota.com>> wrote:
>     16 Jan 2020, 02:22 by 61sundowner at gmail.com
>     <mailto:61sundowner at gmail.com>:
>         If the 'standard map' starts rendering 'disused=yes' the same
>         way as 'disused:*=*' (presently not rendered) then what?
>     Then standard map style will be fixed to
>     remove this bug.
> I took Warin's question to mean what would happen if standard carto
> deliberately chose to handle disused=yes the same way as
> disused:*=*.  Therefore not a bug to be fixed, but an intentional
> permanent change to behaviour.
> If that happened, I would stop marking physical objects as disused.

And that is a problem. A reduction in information caused by a render 
failing to render information.

If the render were to render disused:* then I think all would be happy?


PS the reason I prefer disused:* is that the scheme is well documented, 
logical extensions and appeals to me.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200117/631d47d0/attachment.htm>

More information about the Tagging mailing list