[Tagging] RFC free_water

[Alessandro Sarretta]

Hi,

On 17/01/20 12:08, European Water Project wrote:
>
>      2. Re: RFC free_water (François Lacombe)
>
>
> I see your point and agree it would be preferable to develop a more 
> generalize nomenclature, but also think it is important to choose 
> something that is understandable to a newbie.
>
> If we chose charge:water 
> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:charge:water&action=edit&redlink=1>=free 
> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:charge:water%3Dfree&action=edit&redlink=1>we 
> would need to differentiate when the water is free to anyone (yes in 
> OSM speak) or just paying customers (customers in OSM speak).
>
> We could use :
> charge:water 
> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:charge:water&action=edit&redlink=1>=<free 
> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:charge:water%3Dfree&action=edit&redlink=1>/fee>
> access = <yes/no/customers>
> container = <bring_own/provided>
>
> In the above, European Water Project would only include cafés, bars, 
> etc. with
> charge:water 
> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:charge:water&action=edit&redlink=1>=free 
> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:charge:water%3Dfree&action=edit&redlink=1>
> access = yes
> container = bring_own

If you use the tag /access/ alone, it could refer to the "main" feature 
(the bar or restaurant...).

And water is probably too general... I try suggesting to use 
/tap_water/, that should clearly state that is not bottle water :-)

So it could be:

  * tap_water=yes/no/customers
  * tap_water:free=yes/no/customers
  * tap_water:container=*

This way it seems to me you should be able to cover all the 
possibilities clearly.

m2c

Ale

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200117/b7f56b29/attachment-0001.htm>