[Tagging] Continuous Sidewalk or Cycleway
pelderson at gmail.com
Fri Jan 24 09:58:21 UTC 2020
So for pedestrians, you would add a node on the blue line where it crosses
the centerline of the sidewalk tagged highway=crossing,
Vr gr Peter Elderson
Op vr 24 jan. 2020 om 10:48 schreef Marc Gemis <marc.gemis at gmail.com>:
> I made a quick sketch:
> Of course, this info is then only available for the cars following the
> blue road. Cycling navigation along de Bezuidenhoutseweg will not be
> able to take this info into account. If you want that, you will have
> to draw the cycleway as a separate OSM way.
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 10:37 AM Marc Gemis <marc.gemis at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Add a node where the way, which represents the road for the cars,
> > crosses the cycleway. There does not have to be a way representing the
> > cycleway. We do the same for zebra crossings for pedestrians all the
> > time. We add the node where the path that the pedestrians have to
> > follow crosses the road for the cars.
> > regards
> > m.
> > On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 7:49 AM Peter Elderson <pelderson at gmail.com>
> > >
> > > Op vr 24 jan. 2020 om 07:38 schreef Marc Gemis <marc.gemis at gmail.com>:
> > >>
> > >> could this be solved with highway=crossing and a new, dedicated value
> > >> for crossing?
> > >> And you could map the kerbs before and after that crossing.
> > >
> > >
> > > (How) would this work where sidewalks are not mapped as separate ways
> but with sidewalk=yes?
> > >
> > > Best, Peter Elderson
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Tagging mailing list
> > > Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging