[Tagging] Continuous Sidewalk or Cycleway

Florimond Berthoux florimond.berthoux at gmail.com
Sat Jan 25 22:31:14 UTC 2020


No, I'm not talking about cycling on a sidewalk (I don't know why you
thought that ??), I discuss continuous sidewalk and continuous cycleway
together because it's the same layout, the same problem.
And I'm doing that because I'm interesting in cycling infrastructure more
than others.
For instance this is a typical dutch continuous sidewalk/cycleway
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=52.3608851685737&lng=4.867902368825185&z=17&pKey=ru8z7_PBx5Ao2LU6TX2XfQ&focus=photo&x=0.4098509000113021&y=0.620642840587665&zoom=0

Anyhow I updated the page
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Continuous_Sidewalk
continuous_sidewalk/continuous_cycleway=yes/no are now tags, so no more
collision and can be used on the junction node or on the way.

Le sam. 25 janv. 2020 à 18:36, Peter Elderson <pelderson at gmail.com> a
écrit :

> Ah, I see. You are talking about cycling on the sidewalk. Indeed, very
> unusual in Nederland. To me it's strange to tag continuous_sidewalk mainly
> for cycling.
>
> You talk of junction=continuous_sidewalk, I see no reason to even consider
> that.
> If you have a cycleway, footway or footcycleway around a roundabout, it
> still has crossings with the roads.which can and often will differ, so IMO
> the crossing nodes would carry the attributes.
>
> Well, I have given my thoughts, good luck with the proposal!
>
> Best, Peter Elderson
>

-- 
Florimond Berthoux
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200125/e06915be/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list