[Tagging] Continuous Sidewalk or Cycleway
voschix at gmail.com
Sat Jan 25 22:49:58 UTC 2020
already in your otherwise interesting map that you presented in Heidelberg,
you do not consider all categories:
3) combined foot-cycleway (as sidewalk)
4) segregated foot-cycleway (as sidewalk; with separate lanes for
pedestrians and bicycles)
On Sat, 25 Jan 2020 at 23:32, Florimond Berthoux <
florimond.berthoux at gmail.com> wrote:
> No, I'm not talking about cycling on a sidewalk (I don't know why you
> thought that ??), I discuss continuous sidewalk and continuous cycleway
> together because it's the same layout, the same problem.
> And I'm doing that because I'm interesting in cycling infrastructure more
> than others.
> For instance this is a typical dutch continuous sidewalk/cycleway
> Anyhow I updated the page
> continuous_sidewalk/continuous_cycleway=yes/no are now tags, so no more
> collision and can be used on the junction node or on the way.
> Le sam. 25 janv. 2020 à 18:36, Peter Elderson <pelderson at gmail.com> a
> écrit :
>> Ah, I see. You are talking about cycling on the sidewalk. Indeed, very
>> unusual in Nederland. To me it's strange to tag continuous_sidewalk mainly
>> for cycling.
>> You talk of junction=continuous_sidewalk, I see no reason to even
>> consider that.
>> If you have a cycleway, footway or footcycleway around a roundabout, it
>> still has crossings with the roads.which can and often will differ, so IMO
>> the crossing nodes would carry the attributes.
>> Well, I have given my thoughts, good luck with the proposal!
>> Best, Peter Elderson
> Florimond Berthoux
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging