[Tagging] From the Australian fires (still burning unfortunately) how to map burnt areas
aamackie at gmail.com
Sun Jan 26 22:56:31 UTC 2020
There are some tags documented on the Russian wiki page for key:wood 
that describe various types of damage to wooded areas, one of which is
wood:damage=burnt. I don't think it's been used much outside of Russia, but
it seems fairly reasonable for areas likely to regenerate.
There have been other disaster tagging schemes that seem to be used on
occasion, but they always seem to be listed under a particular disaster's
wiki page rather than in some centralised location.
It would be nice to get some more consistency here, but I think the problem
with this sort of tagging is that these tend to be the sort of thing that
should be locally surveyed and updating OSM generally isn't the priority
unless it is somehow part of a specific organisation's workflow.
On Sun, 26 Jan 2020 at 22:27, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:
> I have come across a German mapper who has used 'landuse=brownfield' to
> map some recently burnt areas in Australia.
> I know this is not appropriate as it is not a land use, nor does it meet
> the OSM meaning of 'brownfield' in all situations.
> Note: this is done in areas, no matter if it is a farm field, recreation
> ground, residential areas etc.
> Tagging buildings and other OSM features is easy where they are wholly
> burnt using the life cycle tagging.
> Should this data be entered in OSM?
> Are flooded damaged areas mapped? Earthquake damaged areas?
> If entered how should they be tagged?
> The keys 'landuse', 'landcover', 'natural' don't look usable to me.
> It may not be possible to use a sub key as the burnt areas do not
> conform to the presently mapped features.
> If mapped then the tagging should be inclusive of other disasters
> (natural or not).
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging