[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Ground)
Warin
61sundowner at gmail.com
Fri Jul 10 12:16:44 UTC 2020
On 10/7/20 9:30 pm, Peter Elderson wrote:
> Looks like humus is a component of soil. So I think soil covers it,
> being a top layer consisting of mixed organic and mineral matter.
>
> To me it is hard to imagine an area as permanently natural=bare_soil.
> Wouldn't there always be some kind of vegetation within a year?
Not always.
Sorry to say but some soils have been so polluted combined with the
resulting soil erosion vegetation has taken some decades to come back.
See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queenstown,_Tasmania#Ecology
>
>
> Best, Peter Elderson
>
>
> Op vr 10 jul. 2020 om 12:42 schreef Michael Montani
> <michael.montani at un.org <mailto:michael.montani at un.org>>:
>
> I agree it could be considered as humus. The distinction between
> organic soil and humus is ambiguous according to
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humus , but I think it is general
> enough to target mostly organic soil.
>
> Shall we consider to add this specification on the tagging? Or
> would humus be considered as bare soil anyway?
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> *Michael Montani*
> GIS Consultant,/Client Solutions Delivery Section/
> *Service for Geospatial Information and Telecommunications
> Technologies*
> United Nations Global Service Centre
> United Nations Department of Operational Support
>
> Brindisi|Phone: +39 0831 056985|Mobile: +39
> 3297193455|Intermission: 158 6985
> E-mail:michael.montani at un.org <mailto:mail at un.org>|www.ungsc.org
> <http://www.ungsc.org>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *Da:* Peter Elderson <pelderson at gmail.com
> <mailto:pelderson at gmail.com>>
> *Inviato:* venerdì 10 luglio 2020 12:02
> *A:* Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
> <tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:tagging at openstreetmap.org>>
> *Oggetto:* Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Ground)
> Organic without any mineral, would you still call that soil?
>
> Vr gr Peter Elderson
>
>
> Op vr 10 jul. 2020 om 11:55 schreef Martin Koppenhoefer
> <dieterdreist at gmail.com <mailto:dieterdreist at gmail.com>>:
>
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 10. Jul 2020, at 11:39, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
> <tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:tagging at openstreetmap.org>>
> wrote:
> >
> > Why it would be natural=bare_ground rather than
> natural=bare_soil?
>
>
> +1,
> I also disagree that “soil can be organic or mineral”. It has
> typically both, organic and mineral components, but organic
> components are a hard requirement. Otherwise it would be sand,
> or rock, or silt or clay or loam etc. (depending on grain size/s).
>
> Cheers Martin
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200710/42457f8e/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Outlook-lkbaor4o.png
Type: image/png
Size: 8546 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200710/42457f8e/attachment-0001.png>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list