[Tagging] Is there a good way to indicate "pushing bicycle not allowed here"?

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Wed Jul 22 12:21:03 UTC 2020

bicycle=explicit_no sounds to me like "there is an explicit sign forbidding this",
not "bicycle vehicle itself is prohibited, not just cycling".

Jul 21, 2020, 23:48 by allroadsworld at gmail.com:

> There lots of forest roads/path, where the bicycle/pushed carried is prohibited. Mostly, private owned land with a access_sign.
> “the bicycle” “transportation vehicle” is prohibited.
> Because, navigation programs do not us bicycle=no, as a hard no, there is the need for a extra value.
> bicycle=explicit_no, means “the vehicle” is prohibited.
> Why a value?
> We need a one value, otherwise a lot of more keys, which makes it things complicated. At the end it means for all explicit no!
> bicycle_pushed <>> => no <>
> motorcycle_pushed=no
> horse_pushed=no ;-)
> moped_pushed=no
> mofa_pushed=no
> etc.
> Better one value, key=explicit_no
> What do you think?
> If we do not solve this problem, this stays forever.
> On the wiki page dismount, this bicycle_pushed is mentioned.
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle%3Ddismount
> For me a wrong advise.
> The problem is wider for more transportation modes, even for other product to carry around.
> Private access_sign rules, can go much further then traffic_sign. In what is prohibited.
> What the owner think and write down on the sign is valid.
> The skateboard is prohibited, means you can not carry a skateboard around with you.
> skateboard=explicit_no
> I need this value to do it correctly. Where the bicycle is no allowed. Or a other value meaning the same.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200722/abbbb5c3/attachment.htm>

More information about the Tagging mailing list