[Tagging] Two side-of-road parking questions
Paul Allen
pla16021 at gmail.com
Fri Jul 24 14:52:04 UTC 2020
On Fri, 24 Jul 2020 at 15:26, Matthew Woehlke <mwoehlke.floss at gmail.com>
wrote:
> On 24/07/2020 10.18, Paul Allen wrote:
> >
> > Sounds like the same thing, Near enough. Especially if some streets
> > have signs saying "no parking at any time."
>
> Right; I didn't mean "we don't have on-street parking", I meant we don't
> mark it like that.
>
Tomato/tomahto. :)
>
> Relatedly: I would call that "on-street parking". To me, a "parking
> lane" is actually more like the NYC video I linked, i.e. a space that is
> dedicated to *parking* and not intended to be used by through traffic.
>
That's my take on it, too.
This is probably a large part of the confusion, as it seems that what
> OSM calls a "parking lane" is what I would call "on-street parking", and
> what I call a "parking lane", OSM considers a parking lot.
>
A lot of the documentation was written by people who don't have British
English as a first language. You have to look at the pictures, too.
>
> >> BTW, this is what NYC apparently considers a "parking lane":
> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RJv4oleZAhQ
> >
> > That's a "floating parking lane," according to the video.
>
> Yeah, I don't know what "floating" means there.
>
You don't? It even explained it in the video. Or the description.
Somewhere.
The parking spaces are detached from the sidewalk because there's a
bicycle lane between the two.
>
> > Looks to me like a parking lot adjoining a road at one side and
> > adjoining a cycle lane at the other. I say this because of what is
> > visible at the left of that "floating parking lane" - an obstacle.
> > Even with no vehicles parked there, through traffic would be
> > obstructed. Difficult to be sure, from the video, though. I'm glad
> > I don't have anything like that around here, otherwise I'd have to
> > figure out how to map it.
>
> It's pretty typical of what I'm dealing with in Quantico, though. We
> seem to have come to an agreement to map this as a "lot".
>
It's how I'd handle the one in the video. But that's just me, bringing my
own cultural assumptions and idiosyncrasies with me. And I'm
very idiosyncratic.
>
> > Was there through traffic in the parking lane itself in the above video?
>
> I can state with some confidence that there isn't *intended* to be.
>
I don't recall seeing any. I don't want to use up more of my
download limit checking, so I'm relying on my increasingly-
defective memory.
Again, I think we've agreed to treat that as a "lot". (Which I believe
> is what I was trying to say, admittedly very badly, with the above.)
>
I think it's a floating parking lot not a floating parking lane. :)
--
Paul
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200724/01396586/attachment.htm>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list