[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Recreational route relation roles

[Peter Elderson]

Just a reminder: in a few days voting will start (if I can figure out how
to do that...).

I would like to invite any one who still has comments or doubts which might
cause a no or abstain vote, to comment here or on the talk page.

If anything serious arises, I would rather postpone the vote and discuss a
solution first, than see the issue as comment in a no or abstain vote!

Best, Peter Elderson


Op wo 20 mei 2020 om 13:33 schreef Peter Elderson <pelderson at gmail.com>:

> Please review and comment on this proposal:
>
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Recreational_route_relation_roles
>
>
> Definition: specification of role values for members of a recreational
> route relation
>
> The status has changed to proposed as of today
>
> Comments can be placed on the talk page and/or here.  Please note that
> this proposal is meant to get a basic role set approved and documented.
>
> Thanks for helping to finally get this done!
>
> Best, Peter Elderson
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200601/42545695/attachment.htm>