[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Recreational route relation roles
pelderson at gmail.com
Mon Jun 1 08:03:41 UTC 2020
Just a reminder: in a few days voting will start (if I can figure out how
to do that...).
I would like to invite any one who still has comments or doubts which might
cause a no or abstain vote, to comment here or on the talk page.
If anything serious arises, I would rather postpone the vote and discuss a
solution first, than see the issue as comment in a no or abstain vote!
Best, Peter Elderson
Op wo 20 mei 2020 om 13:33 schreef Peter Elderson <pelderson at gmail.com>:
> Please review and comment on this proposal:
> Definition: specification of role values for members of a recreational
> route relation
> The status has changed to proposed as of today
> Comments can be placed on the talk page and/or here. Please note that
> this proposal is meant to get a basic role set approved and documented.
> Thanks for helping to finally get this done!
> Best, Peter Elderson
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging