[Tagging] Features underwater (inside reservoirs)

Peter Neale nealepb at yahoo.co.uk
Mon Jun 8 10:13:06 UTC 2020



>Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 11:31:20 +0200
>From: Cornelis <cornelis.H at web.de>
>To: tagging at openstreetmap.org
>Subject: Re: [Tagging] Features underwater (inside reservoirs)
>Message-ID: <d27da201-539a-a35a-bde5-bce0be7b8913 at web.de>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"

>This thread is a great help to me, as I recently discovered this bridge
>and wondered if it can be tagged in a more appropriate way:
>https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/51.18387/8.95239

>Currently it is tagged like that (shortened):
>historic=bridge
>intermittent=yes
>layer=-1
>man_made=bridge
>name=Aseler Brücke
>seasonal=yes
>tourism=attraction

>With these tags and the surrounding footways the bridge is treated as
>normal (foot)way by OSRM and graphhopper, although it only falls dry
>roughly every other autumn. Is this a tagging issue that may be resolved
>with correct/additional tags? After reading the discussion I think at
>least three tags should be added:

>building=bridge
>abandoned=yes
>location=underwater

>Then some questions on other tags currently in use:
>• historic=bridge seems ok to me, but I'm not sure if it is a conflict
>with building=bridge. Do I have to choose either one?
>• intermittent seems to only be in use with water bodies, as far as i
>can tell after reading the wiki article.
>• seasonal is somewhat related with intermittent but in use for other
>things as well. Should I remove these two, nonetheless?

>Regards
>Cornelis

Have you considered "flood_prone=yes" (14700 uses in taginfo), although I guess that is more used for places that are normally dry and only occasionally wet?
  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200608/399fcfc9/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list