[Tagging] Features underwater (inside reservoirs)
61sundowner at gmail.com
Tue Jun 9 02:11:44 UTC 2020
On 8/6/20 10:14 pm, Paul Allen wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Jun 2020 at 10:33, Cornelis <cornelis.H at web.de
> <mailto:cornelis.H at web.de>> wrote:
> With these tags and the surrounding footways the bridge is treatey
> as normal (foot)way by OSRM and graphhopper, altough it only falls
> dry roughly every other autumn. Is this a tagging issue that may
> be resolved with correct/additional tags? After reading the
> discussion I think at least three tags should be added:
> Then some questions on other tags currently in use:
> • historic=bridge seems ok to me, but I'm not sure if it is a
> conflict with building=bridge. Do I have to choose either one?
> They are not mutually exclusive. If it is a tourist attraction then
> it could
> also have tourism=attraction.
> • intermittent seems to only be in use with water bodies, as far
> as i can tell after reading the wiki article.
> • seasonal is somewhat related with intermittent but in use for
> other things as well. Should I remove these two, nonetheless?
> Neither seem appropriate to me. However, what you should have is
> to prevent routers from including it in walking routes. What you could
> do, to
> show it is occasionally usable (if it is), is something like:
> access:conditional=yes @ (above water)
I would keep seasonal but make it more specific
Conditional key does not look to have text base entry ... might be
better to use opening hours?
opening_hours= "above water" ???
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging