[Tagging] Do we map pedestrian crossings twice?

António Madeira antoniomadeira at gmx.com
Wed Jun 10 23:06:32 UTC 2020



Às 19:29 de 10/06/2020, Graeme Fitzpatrick escreveu:
>
>
>
> On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 at 06:30, Clifford Snow <clifford at snowandsnow.us
> <mailto:clifford at snowandsnow.us>> wrote:
>
>
>
>     Sorry - I should have been clearer on #3. The red dot is a
>     validation warning that the two ways intersect, but it isn't
>     marked as a crossing.
>
>
> (Not having a go at you, Clifford, just using your comment as an
> example! :-))
>
> "Recently" (2019?), iD has also started pointing out / suggesting /
> demanding that all crossings (be they road - footway, driveway -
> footway, footway - footway / cycleway, road - road etc) eg
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/-28.08457/153.44892 (if the
> "error" doesn't show, please click on either side of Second Avenue),
> also be marked as a crossing.
>
> When you go ahead & "fix" it, it inserts a highway=crossing at that
> point: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=21/-28.07834/153.44686.
>
> Good luck with telling them they're "wrong"!
>
> Thanks
>
> Graeme
>

That's an obvious error.
The ways must cross somewhere (that's what the warning states) , but it
doesn't tell you to add a crossing.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200610/0ee6a72e/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list